- Arts & Culture 6204
- Business & Economics 676
- Computers 329
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 70
- Education & Science 76847
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 3920
- Coursework 15556
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 316
- Drawings 1596
- Ecology 5
- Economy 81
- English 80
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17651
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 12624
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15120
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 65
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 160
- Tests 8753
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 382
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 872
- Fiction 708
- House, Family & Entertainment 84
- Law 133
- Website Promotion 70
Solution of the problem, an example of judicial practice and plot
Refunds: 0
Uploaded: 04.12.2014
Content: 16.doc 34,5 kB
Product description
Solution of the problem, an example of judicial practice and plot
Joint-stock company "Peter House" engaged in wholesale trade of audio and video, decided to create a website on the Internet for e-commerce and the implementation of advertising their services. As the domain name was decided to use the company name, which is also a registered trademark.
However, the provider to which the firm has requested grant it the right to administer the domain, said that this is not possible, since this domain already owns Citizen Petrov. As it turned out, Petrov is the administrator of over one hundred domains, in one way or another used the English word «house». Over the past two years he owned it peredelegiroval several domains to various firms, who are in need.
JSC "Peter House" Petrov contacted and invited him to transfer the rights to the domain «peterhouse» for a small fee. Petrov refused to do, saying that he was ready to give up the rights to the domain only for a substantial amount. Since the company is not satisfied, she decided to take away the right to Petrov disputed domain name in court.
What current legislation can rely JSC "Peter House" in the fight over the ownership of the disputed domain name?
Feedback
0| Period | |||
| 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |