- Arts & Culture 6204
- Business & Economics 676
- Computers 329
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 70
- Education & Science 76847
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 3920
- Coursework 15556
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 316
- Drawings 1596
- Ecology 5
- Economy 81
- English 80
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17651
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 12624
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15120
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 65
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 160
- Tests 8753
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 382
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 872
- Fiction 708
- House, Family & Entertainment 84
- Law 133
- Website Promotion 70
Strict typification typical of Roman contract
Content: S19-628.docx 13,42 kB
Product description
The strict typification inherent in the Roman contract system was reflected in the classification of contracts by the way they were concluded: verbal, literal, real, consensual. The Roman classification of contracts reflects the long historical experience of the legal regulation of civil circulation. Gradually, a correspondence was reached between the typical interest and the recognized form of his satisfaction, which corresponded to the “social value of free individual will determination”.
I.A. Pokrovsky believed that the Roman system of obligations was far from flawless theoretically: “... Perhaps the most characteristic drawback of this system is its complete absence of obligations arising from unilateral promises - for example, from a public promise of a reward for something (for finding a lost thing) etc.)". Pokrovsky noted that, having undergone some changes in some parts in the near future, the system of obligations did not change its spirit and basic principles. Moreover, he mentioned a number of laws that led to a deterioration of the system. E. Anners in his work “History of European Law” also criticized the development of certain types of obligations in ancient Rome (for example, collateral agreements).
Consider the above opinions. What is your own idea of the Roman system of treaties (contracts) and the level of its development?
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0| Period | |||
| 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |